The site's referral record is not registered; the code, benefits and commercial arrangement in the account-opening guide remain unverified. Nothing on this page depends on which platform you use, and nobody pays to appear in it. Full disclosure.
How a chain prices a withdrawal
This gives you no figures, on purpose. It gives you the model, which does not expire, and tells you where the current number lives.
Pick a pricing model and the result appears here. If you are not sure which family your chain belongs to, the classification notes below will place it.
A withdrawal fee table published today is wrong within weeks. The pricing model behind it has been stable for years, and it is the part that lets you sanity-check any figure you are shown.
Why there are no numbers here
We could publish a table of withdrawal fees. It would be accurate on the day of publication and quietly wrong a month later, and the people reading it a year from now would have no way of knowing which.
Two things change independently: the chain's own cost conditions move continuously, and the platform's published fee for that chain is a business decision it revises whenever it likes. A snapshot of the second, laid over a moving version of the first, produces a number that looks authoritative and is not.
What does not go stale is the model. Knowing that a chain prices by data size rather than by amount tells you immediately that splitting one withdrawal into five will cost roughly five times as much, and that knowledge holds regardless of what any fee page says today.
The gap between what you pay and what it costs
Most platforms charge a flat published fee per chain, updated periodically. The actual on-chain cost floats continuously. So the two are almost never equal.
When the network is quiet, the flat fee usually sits above the real cost, and the difference stays with the platform. When the network is congested, the real cost can exceed the flat fee, and the platform absorbs the difference — or suspends withdrawals on that chain until conditions settle, which is a possibility worth knowing about before you need it.
This is not a criticism. Flat pricing is predictable, and predictability has value. But it explains something people find confusing: why the fee your platform charges is not the fee a block explorer shows for your transaction. They are two different numbers measuring two different things.
Same asset, different chains
The choice that saves the most money is not which platform to withdraw from. It is which chain to withdraw on.
Widely-issued assets exist on several chains at once, and the cost of moving them differs by orders of magnitude between those chains. The same withdrawal routed through a high-throughput chain instead of a congested one can cost a small fraction of the price.
Two cautions attach to that, and both are unforgiving:
- The receiving end must support the chain you send on. The address format sometimes looks identical across chains, which means the interface may accept the transfer without complaint and the assets arrive somewhere nobody can reach them. This is the single most common way people lose funds during an ordinary transfer.
- Cheap to arrive is not cheap to leave. If the destination is a chain you will later need to move off, the exit cost belongs in the same calculation.
The full breakdown of the pricing models, and how the flat-fee gap behaves in practice, is in the article on withdrawal costs across chains.
Where the current number lives
Three places, in order of reliability:
- The withdrawal screen itself, after you have entered an amount and selected a chain. This is the number you will actually be charged, and it is the only one that is definitive.
- The platform's fee page for withdrawals. Usually correct, occasionally behind the interface.
- A block explorer or fee estimator for the chain. Tells you what the network currently costs, which is what lets you judge whether the platform's flat fee is reasonable right now.
If the first and second disagree, the first wins. If the first looks far out of line with the third, waiting a few hours is often the whole answer.