Corrections record
Everything we have changed is logged here, whether we found it ourselves or a reader did. A reference site that never publishes corrections usually has not avoided errors.
| Date | Correction | Type |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-23 | OKX fee figures were copied from the wrong entity
As published: OKX spot entry tier given as 0.2000% maker and 0.3500% taker, labelled simply "OKX". Problem: those figures come from OKX's US fee page, a different legal entity with a different price list. The global site's equivalent tier is 0.0800% maker and 0.1000% taker. Effect: a reader would have concluded OKX was more than twice as expensive as Binance, when the global site's maker rate is in fact lower. Resolution: the fee matrix now lists both entities on separate rows with their own sources; the two affected articles were recalculated, and a section on "one brand, two price lists" was added. |
Data |
| 2026-08-23 | An image that could not support the text was withdrawn
As published: the fee comparison page carried a screenshot of a Kraken fee page. Problem: the capture had switched language automatically and the fee table was collapsed, so none of the figures cited in the text were visible — an image standing in as a source while proving nothing. Effect: readers would have assumed the Kraken figures were evidenced by a screenshot when they were not. Resolution: the file was deleted; Kraken's figures now carry a source link and check date with no accompanying image. |
Image |
| 2026-08-23 | Two internal links shared identical anchor text
As published: the fee matrix and the fee structures article both linked to the account-opening guide using the same anchor wording. Problem: repeated anchor text makes two links that should each fit their own context read as boilerplate, and it breaches this site's own internal linking rule. Effect: minimal for readers; an editorial standards issue. Resolution: one was rewritten so that every in-body link to that page now uses distinct anchor text. |
Editorial |
How we handle errors
When we find an error: fix it, then log an entry here stating what was published, what the problem was, what wrong conclusion a reader would have drawn, and how it was resolved.
We do not edit silently. A reference site that can quietly unsay things leaves no record of what it said yesterday, and no way for a reader to judge its accuracy. The cost of publishing corrections is admitting to errors; the benefit is that every sentence here has a traceable history.
All three entries above were found by us while checking sources during the build, not reported by readers. They are logged rather than treated as "pre-launch so they do not count", because the value of this page is precisely that it has been real from the first day.
What counts as a correction
- Factual errors. A figure copied wrong, a rule described backwards, a source attributed incorrectly.
- Misleading phrasing. Literally accurate wording that would lead a reader to a wrong conclusion.
- Evidence problems. An image or citation that cannot support the claim it accompanies.
- Editorial issues affecting credibility. Such as the third entry above.
Not logged here: typographical fixes, layout adjustments, styling changes, and routine data updates. A data update is not a correction — replacing a figure marked 2026-08 after a platform changes its pricing is what this site is supposed to do. The check month sits next to every figure.
How to tell us
If you find an error here, or a figure that has gone stale, write to [email protected] with the page address and the specific passage.
Reports of stale data are the most valuable, because we cannot watch every page at every platform continuously.